Dialogue on Migration Governance in the Euro-Mediterranean Region (DiaMiGo)
The follow-up application of the DAAD-Project “DiaMiGo II – Dialogue on Migration Governance in the Euro-Mediterranean Region – 2025-2026” between the University of Cologne (UoC) and the American University in Cairo (AUC) has been successful.
Coordinated by Prof. Gerda Heck (Center for Migration and Refugees Studies at the AUC) and Dr. Karim Zafer (Global Responsibility Unit of the UoC), students and researchers—from PhD candidates to post-docs and professors in Cologne and Cairo—are working together to develop a more coherent understanding of global migration phenomena and their challenges. DiaMiGo brings several institutes, research centers and Community Based Organisations (CBOs) together. These include: The Global Responsibility Unit, The Global South Studies Center (GSSC), Department of Languages and Cultures of the Islamicate World, Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Integrationshaus e.V. from Cologne, and the Center for Migration and Refugees Studies, Department of Sociology, Egyptology and Anthropology, and Saint Andrew’s Refugee Services from Cairo, Egypt.
The UoC contributes perspectives from anthropology and cultures of the Islamicate World, while the AUC focuses on public policy, development studies, sociology, and migration governance. Through online lecture series, research academies (involving professors, junior researchers, students and practitioners) in Cologne and Cairo, teaching staff exchanges, and research stays in both cities, DiaMiGo I (2023-2024) has focused on actor- and object-centered perspectives as well as governance perspectives on migration infrastructures. This has included topics such as recent changes in legal infrastructures and border regimes that implement policies and regulate various forms of mobility in the Mediterranean, as well as the movement of objects, ideas, and more-than-human (MTH) entities. For more information, visit our website: www.diamigo.net
In the follow-up project DiaMiGo II, we aim to address this topic by comparing divergent concepts of “integration”, inclusion, and exclusion through a decolonizing lens. We will analyse these concepts in relation to how they are understood, controversially discussed, and practiced both within Germany (as a representative European country) and Egypt (as an example of a Global South country, where the majority of the world’s migrants and refugees reside).
While the integration of migrants and refugees has been widely discussed—and the related (public) discourse been criticized—in academic and policy circles in the Global North, it has not been a central focus of policy debates in the Global South, as these countries were not traditionally seen as destinations for newcomers to settle and establish new lives (FitzGerald & Arar 2019). However, despite the absence of formal integration policies in many Global South countries, migrants and refugees often find themselves in situations where they must develop their own strategies and navigate pathways for de facto “self-integration.” These integration models, based on “community social capital,” are typically informal and unrecognized in national and international policy debates (Ahmed 2024).
Given the lack of a universally accepted definition of integration and the absence of consensus on what successful integration looks like or how it can be measured (Phillimore, Morrice, & Strang 2024), a comparative analysis in the project DiaMiGo II will contribute to both migration studies and policy-making.
Click here to read more about DiaMiGo I (2023-2024)
Without centuries of dialogue and migration across the Mediterranean world, Egypt, and all Mediterranean counterparts, would not be where and what they are today. The Mediterranean, in fact, was once viewed as a bridge between North Africa and the European world for the exchange of goods, ideas, and naturally, for the movement of people between empires and, later, nation states (Moreira Rodriguez Leite, et. al 2020; Holdermann et. al 2020; 2021). Relatively speaking, only recently has the Mediterranean Sea been viewed by some as a border between the European continent and its North African neighbors to keep people on the African continent and outside of Europe. As times have changed, so has migration and the questions surrounding the movement of people. Together with the increasing volume of people on the move, we are seeing, amongst other things, changing demographics, advancing technology, evolving needs of labor markets and continued challenges posed by wars, shortages, human rights violations, increased inequalities between the Global North and the Global South and climate change as drivers for migration. In fact, humanity has always been on the move and we will continue to do so in search for new opportunities and for exchange. In recent years, however, migration is often declared in mass-mediated public discourse and the dominant political debate to be a “crisis” that needs to be controlled and often to be hindered through myriad tactics of bordering. Alongside the proliferation of migrant struggles and suffering in transit border zones across the planet, the Mediterranean Sea has incontestably earned the disgraceful distinction of being the veritable epicenter of border crossings (De Genova 2017). Any solution in this region should be based on a dialogue between the sending, transit and receiving countries. A dialogue which takes into consideration not only the interests and needs of the nation-states but also the aspirations of (potential) migrants and the protection of human rights. In fact, the dialogue between countries of the Mediterranean world on the topic is constantly adjusting to the 21st century world, which seems to be a world in a constant state of flux.
This DAAD exchange-project aims at exploring current changes and discussions being held around migration dialogue between Europe and the North African Mediterranean world. The project seeks to establish a research network for migration scholars and institutions in the Euro-Mediterranean Region that will last beyond the funding period. We will build up such a network between the Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology, the Global South Studies Center at the University of Cologne (UoC) and the Center for Migration and Refugee Studies (CMRS) at the American University in Cairo (AUC). We will build up a network in the MENA region, coordinated by the AUC and the regional office of the UoC in Cairo. Students in Cologne and Cairo will become aware of the global challenges of migration, researchers from PhD to post-doc and Professor levels will work together for a more coherent view in the global migration phenomena.
The main question this project will analyze is how the dialogue and relationship between the European Union and the Mediterranean world has changed in the past few years and how this affects the relationships within this region as well as the lives of (potential) migrants when it comes to migration governance. In addition, this project wants to address whether the newly-funded development projects, for example the European Trust Fund for Africa (EUTF), are fulfilling their main objectives and how the migrants and host communities are benefiting or not benefitting from said development aid.
To sum up, in order to have a better understanding of migration movements, politics and dynamics between the two shores of the Mediterranean, including historical and contemporary power relations and geo-political interests, an intercultural, interdisciplinary and intersectional framework and dialogue are needed.