Amaranth has been cultivated as a crop for around 8,000 years. It is very resistant to heat and drought, requires relatively little water and its grains contain many proteins. In addition, amaranth is not a real grain, but a so-called pseudocereal and is therefore gluten-free. It could thus play an important role in securing global food security in the future. However, amaranth has not yet undergone many of the human-made changes typical of cultivated plants. It produces relatively small seeds that fall down instead of remaining attached to the panicle. What may be advantageous for the wild plant to spread is unfavourable for a cultivated plant that is intended to be harvested. This could be the starting point for future breeding programmes.
Another interesting fact for the scientists is that, unlike maize, amaranth was domesticated three times independently – twice in Central America and once in South America. “This means we can look at an 8,000-year selection experiment in different regions of the world. We are investigating whether evolution is always the same or different. Ultimately, we are deciphering the genetic code and finding out how to switch genes on and off correctly so that the result is something that actually works,” said Stetter, who recently received the prestigious ERC Starting Grant from the European Research Council for his work.
Even though some amaranth plants grow and flower in the greenhouse at the Institute for Plant Sciences, Stetter’s team is mostly busy sequencing genomes on the computer. Amaranth has a relatively small genome with ‘only’ 500 million base pairs. In comparison, maize is a true genetic giant with 2.3 billion base pairs per plant. “We scan the genome of thousands of individuals of the plant ten to a hundred times,” said Stetter. From this genetic code, the scientists can decode and trace the history of populations. “The code helps us to understand how and under what conditions certain traits develop and which populations adapt well to specific locations due to certain genetic principles. In this way, our results can support targeted breeding.”
In order to make agriculture sustainable, we need plants that deliver a good yield or a high protein content and lots of nutrients even under poor conditions. “New crops that are particularly adaptable or resilient in the face of climate change can make an important contribution to food security,” emphasized the scientist. In addition, pests and pathogens need to be better understood because they also adapt to their environment and occupy specific niches. “If we understand how pathogens work and how some plants protect themselves, this can also be useful for other plants.”
Microbes are the key factor
Professor Dr Alga Zuccaro, one of Stetter’s colleagues at CEPLAS, pursues this line line of reseach. She aims to make plants more resistant to pathogens. However, her main focus is on the soil microbiota, i.e. the entirety of small organisms, particularly on those that interact with the plant through the roots. “In the end, we both want to understand how plants react to stress. Markus Stetter investigates this using a specific plant. My research group explores how microbes influence the immune response of various plants to biotic and abiotic stress,” explained Zuccaro.
While some microbes cause disease, others can be beneficial to the plants. They can increase plant growth in nutrient-poor environments and improve their resilience to pathogens. How exactly the interaction between the microbiota and the plant works is complex and not yet well understood. However, recent findings show that the soil microbiota is an important factor for agriculture and plant breeding. Zuccaro sees great potential here: “If we let plants grow in a nutrient-poor environment without microbes, they hardly grow at all and can even die. However, if microbes are present in the soil that interact with the plant, they survive despite the nutrient-poor environment. Our results show that microbes play a key role.”